Not everyone was taken in. ‘It is
quite clear’, wrote William of Newburgh, half a century later, ‘that
everything this man wrote about Arthur and his successors, and indeed his
predecessors... was made up!’. But Geoffrey’s book became a runaway success, a
medieval best-seller. Even today, some 215 manuscript copies of the History still survive, putting it second
only to the Bible.
Geoffrey would undoubtedly by cheered, as I was,
to read the reviews of his book, good and bad, on Amazon.com. Here are the edited highlights
(with original spelling, punctuation etc):
'Definately
plausible, whatever the critics may say. Well written and quite readable, for
all history buffs, this one is a must.'
'Too tedious and detailed
for me. It read like a doctorate thesis. One star rating should have been one
moon.'
'This is a very interesting
book about the Kings of Britain, more detail on their lives than in history
books I have read before. If your interest lies in this area, as mine does, I
believe you would enjoy this book too.'
'The major flaw in the
content is that the history is totally fictitious. If you want to learn the
history of the kings of Britain, choose another book. Unless, that is, you
believe that King Arthur ruled from Paris (as one example).'
'Excellent historical
background for all you folks who like the middle ages and are interested in the
succession of the English throne.'
'Surprise and delight rolled
over me every time I closed this book. I wish it was a standard read for all
students in our nation.'
'I don't know why I got this
book. Seems like I had heard about it being a classic. It's mostly just a bunch
of stuff some guy made up a long time ago.'
'The history is an example of a reference
book to keep on hand. It is not an easy read straight through if one wants to
remember any of the important kings and few will remember the very early kings
of England. Some are obviously of more significance than others.'
'The Kings of Britain is well written and well received. It gives me insight to the dimention of the UK.'
'I had to read this for a class. It tells you the history of Britain, from the first kings, to Arthur and so on. I just read the Arthur part, because the class was about King Arthur.'
'It's a book for learning
and reference == not to enjoy the same as a novel. There is so much information
in it, you have to read it over and over, but the information is as good as it
gets.'
'This is an excellant
history book but was rather dull to read. The research disclosed efficient and
enthusiastic diligence and awed many readers with the disclosure of the
relevant details. I do my own research into written history products and can
reveal this book is not widely read.'
'I give this book 5 stars as
I think it covered all I was looking for if you are interested in English
history.'
'This book is essential
reading for those interested in the early origins of British royalty and the associated political traditions.'
'Don't waste even the $0.99
this book costs. It only covers that period prior to the Roman invasion up to a
bit after it. If you want to learn about the monarchs of Britain in later
centuries, go elsewhere. I was very disappointed.'
Geoffrey of Monmouth: the Dan Brown of the 12th century!
ReplyDelete